Protests 684930-G of Frank Samuel & Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding a plaintiff’s allegations of “business chicanery” do not state a claim under Mass. Gen. L. c. 266, §91 because the plaintiff fails to allege a false or misleading statement
• “This Court has consistently held that a plaintiff is not entitled to recover for conversion of intangible property.”
• “[Plaintiff’s] claim in this regard fails to state that the benefit was ‘conferred upon the defendant by the plaintiff.’” (citation omitted)
• \a plaintiff is not entitled to recover for conversion of intangible property\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).