Protests 63920-K of Corporacion Argentina de Productores de Carnes

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a “defendant’s privacy in [his or] her own home, [is] a setting in which the protections of Article I, section 9, are at their highest”
• determining that the denial of a motion to suppress was not harmless because the erroneously admitted evidence was central to the state’s case against the defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).