Protests 636879-G of Bloomingdale Bros.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that issues that could be litigated on direct appeal could not be litigated in state post-conviction relief
• holding that claims must be raised on direct appeal, if possible, or they will be barred by the doctrine of res judicata.
• holding that a party is precluded from raising a claim that he failed to raise during the course of his direct appeal
• holding that res judicata bars a criminal defendant from raising in post-conviction proceedings those claims that could have been raised on direct appeal
• concluding that because the defendant could have, but did not, raise a claimed sentencing error on direct appeal, the error was now barred by the doctrine of res judicata
• holding that any claim that was raised or could have been raised on direct appeal is barred from review on post conviction under the doctrine of res judicata

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).