Protests 57083-K of James G. Hardy & Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the temporal proximity between the police illegality and the defendant’s consent was close where the police requested and received the defendant’s consent while the unlawful seizure was ongoing
• no mitigating circumstances “separated defendant’s consent from the unlawful police conduct: Defendant was not told that he could simply remain in the car or that he could refuse to consent to the search”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).