Protests 56648-K of American Express Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the board’s order lacked substantial reason when it included inconsistent factual findings and failed to rationally connect those findings to its conclusion
• order that included “inconsistent factual findings and [did] not include a rational explanation of how those findings logically lead to its conclusion” lacked substantial reason
• reversing and remanding order that lacked substantial reason

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).