Protests 55327-K of Copeland & Thompson, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a change in a child’s permanency plan did not qualify as a foster care placement under ICWA because it “did not involve the ‘significant shift in legal rights’ that occurs when a guardianship is established”
• holding that a change in a child’s permanency plan did not qualify as a foster care placement under ICWA because it “did not involve the ‘significant shift in legal rights’ that occurs when a guardianship is established”
• holding that a change in a child’s permanency plan did not qualify as a foster care placement under ICWA because it “did not involve the 'significant shift in legal rights' that occurs when a guardianship is established”
• applying Mathews factors to parents’ claim of due process violation related to evidentiary issues
• “There is no doubt that, as a general matter, a parent’s desire for and right to the companionship, care, cus- tody and management of his or her children is an important interest.” (Internal quotation marks and citations omitted.)
• “There is no doubt that, as a general matter, a parent’s desire for and right to the companionship, care, cus- tody and management of his or her children is an important interest.” (Internal quotation marks and citations omitted.)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).