Skip to main content
· 6/28/1945

Protests 54344-K of Anglo French Drug Co.

Citations

  • 15 Cust. Ct. 220

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reversing and remanding the trial court’s ruling because it did not offer an “explanation of how it chose the amount of life insurance that husband was ordered to maintain * * * and nothing in the record provide[d] an evidentiary basis” for its decision
  • reversing and remanding the trial court’s ruling because it did not offer an “explanation of how it chose the amount of life insurance that husband was ordered to maintain * * * and nothing in the record provide[d] an evidentiary basis” for its decision
  • an issue was not preserved where husband failed to bring the purported error to the court’s attention, despite ample opportunity to do so, during the period of time between the court’s initial finding and entry of the final judgment
  • an issue was not preserved where, “in the time after the first letter opinion had been issued, but before the court had entered a general judgment, husband did not bring the purported error to the court’s attention”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ekwall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.