Protests 54301-K of Porter (Phila.), Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• restraining order was not supported by sufficient evidence in part because there was no evidence of abuse or concerns about abuse between the time that the petitioner left the respondent’s home and the FAPA hearing
• viewing the evidence supporting a FAPA restraint order “objectively”
• the trial court erred in continuing the FAPA restraining order, because “none of the evidence presented in this case [wa] s sufficient to support a determination that respondent’s conduct put petitioner at imminent risk of further abuse or credibly threatened her physical safety”
• the evidence was insuf- ficient to prove a credible threat to the petitioner’s physical safety, where there was no history of violence or threats in the relationship, and threats during the breakup relating to finances and child custody were not threats to “physi- cal safety”
• the evidence was insuf- ficient to prove a credible threat to the petitioner’s physical safety, where there was no history of violence or threats in the relationship, and threats during the breakup relating to finances and child custody were not threats to “physi- cal safety”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).