Protests 44216-K of Kaufmann Dept. Stores, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the trial court did not err in denying the defendant’s motion to suppress under the Fourth Amendment attenuation test set forth in Bailey, and recognizing that the result under Article I, section 9, “would almost certainly” be the same
• describing the “unresolved conflict” in this court’s cases regarding the relative priority to be given the “first things first” doctrine and preservation principles
• applying Brown factors, as discussed in Bailey

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).