Protests 36969-K of Columbia Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• restraining order was not supported by sufficient evidence despite the parties’ “tumultuous relationship” involving volatile and sometimes violent episodes because “the volatility that characterized the parties’ relationship ended once the parties ceased cohabiting”
• “ ‘Domestic arguing, when not accompanied by phys- ical contact, physical harm, or a threat of violence,’ is not abuse.” (Quoting ORS 107.705(1).)
• volatile and sometimes violent relationship did not demonstrate that former boyfriend posed imminent danger of further abuse or credible threat to petitioner’s safety once the parties stopped cohabitating
• volatile and occasionally violent relationship did not demonstrate that former boyfriend posed imminent danger of further abuse or credible threat to petitioner’s safety once the parties stopped cohabitating
• once the parties stopped cohabitating, their volatile, sometimes violent history was not sufficient to demonstrate that the respondent posed a credible threat and that the petitioner was in imminent danger of further abuse
• once the parties stopped cohabitating, their volatile, some- times violent history was not sufficient to demonstrate that the respondent posed a credible threat and that the peti- tioner was in imminent danger of further abuse

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).