Protests 18756-K of Eastman Kodak Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that it was error for the trial court to admit evidence of the name of the defendant’s crime of conviction because that evidence “was devoid of any probative value and was unfairly prejudicial”
• reversing the trial court's admission of evidence that was devoid of probative value and was unfairly prejudicial to defendant, and remanding for a new trial, notwithstanding the lack of a record regarding the trial court's OEC 403 balancing rationale

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).