Protests 15731-K of H. B. Lehman Connor Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that termination of a prisoner’s job was a sufficient adverse action to support a First Amendment retaliation claim
• citing, e.g., Winter v. NRDC, Inc. , 555 U.S. 7 , 20, 129 S.Ct. 365 , 172 L.Ed.2d 249 (2008)
• granting warden-defendant’s motion for summary judgment where inmate asserted that BOP grievance process put warden on notice of the alleged misconduct but “did not provide any factual detail to support [his] conclusory allegations”
• there is no constitutional right to a prison job and the “deprivation of a prison job states no independent constitutional claim.”
• “[I]nmates do not have a constitutional right to a prison job, and in turn, the deprivation of a prison job states no independent constitutional claim.”
• “[A] prisoner is not responsible when he follows the proper grievance procedures and prison officials nevertheless mishandle the grievance.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).