Protests 117310-K of T. Sumida & Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that merger of three counts of sexual abuse was required when “the entire violent epi- sode at issue occurred in the confined space of the bathroom, without interruption by any significant event, and without pause in defendant’s aggression” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• concluding that multiple guilty verdicts for sexual abuse based on touching of differ- ent body parts merge into a single conviction for first-degree sexual abuse because there was no evidence of a sufficient pause, ORS 161.067(3), between each act of abuse
• construing “the same conduct or criminal 358 State v. Carlton episode” in ORS 161.067(1) to mean the same conduct, the same criminal episode, or both
• construing “the same conduct or criminal 358 State v. Carlton episode” in ORS 161.067(1) to mean the same conduct, the same criminal episode, or both
• ORS 161.067(3) does not prevent merger of multiple counts of sexual abuse that involve touching separate parts of a victim’s body.
• ORS 161.067(3) does not prevent merger of multiple counts of sexual abuse that involve touching separate parts of a victim’s body.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).