Protests 113128-K of Cohen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting issue preclusion argument because “[a] meaningful [permanency hearing] evaluation neces- sarily means that the prior evaluation is not automatically preclusive”
• reversing and remanding permanency judgment that changed the perma- nency plan when juvenile court failed to conduct the legal analysis required by ORS 419B.476(5) and ORS 419B.498(2) to determine most appropriate permanency plan
• reversing and remanding permanency judgment that changed the perma- nency plan when juvenile court failed to conduct the legal analysis required by ORS 419B.476(5) and ORS 419B.498(2) to determine most appropriate permanency plan
• so stating with respect to the required “com- pelling reason” finding under ORS 419B.476(5) and ORS 419B.498(2)(b) when changing a child’s permanency plan to adoption
• so stating with respect to the required “com- pelling reason” finding under ORS 419B.476(5) and ORS 419B.498(2)(b) when changing a child’s permanency plan to adoption

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).