Protests 110955-K of Harmar Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “[b]ecause the content of Webster’s—exclud- ing the addenda section—has remained static since 1961, in general, it is appropriate to treat it as a contemporaneous source for statutes dating from at least that point forward”
• using Snyder analysis to interpret the phrase “otherwise make available” as used in ORS 471.410(2
• “Because the content of Webster’s—excluding the addenda section—has remained static since 1961, in general, it is appropriate to treat it as a contemporaneous source for statutes dating from at least that point forward[.]”
• “Because the content of Webster’s -excluding the addenda section-has remained static since 1961, in general, it is appropriate to treat it as a contemporaneous source for statutes dating from at least that point forward.”
• “Because the content of Webster’s — excluding the addenda section — has remained static since 1961, in general, it is appropriate to treat it as a contemporaneous source for statutes dating from at least that point forward”
• evidence was insufficient to support the inference that alco- hol that minors consumed was from a particular source con- trolled by the defendant where the record reflected that the alcohol could have come from a range of sources

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).