Protests 110765-K of Thorens Importing Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• emphasizing that, “[o]n review of the board’s evaluation of expert opinions, we do not substitute our judgment for that of the board; rather, we determine whether the board’s evaluation of that evidence was reasonable” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• “[I]t is at least plausible that the board’s misstatement affected the board’s decision to credit Feigenbaum’s opinion over Sabahi’s. Because it is not possible for us to determine to what extent the errors * * * affected the board’s decision, we remand to the board for reconsideration.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).