Protests 10324-K of Geo. S. Bush & Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a plaintiff “cannot recover under Indiana law for his claims of malicious prosecution, trespass and trespass to chattel . . . .” (internal citations omitted)
• “The initial detention was thus lawful and cannot support a claim for false imprisonment
• “Summary judgment is not a tool to decide legitimately contested issues, and it may not be granted unless no reasonable jury could decide in favor the nonmoving party.” (citing Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322 (1986))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).