Protests 103059-G of Taub

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that the “possible harm to society from allowing unprotected speech to go unpunished is outweighed by the possibility that protected speech will be muted.”
• holding that First Amendment protection extended to “truthful” advertising of “routine” legal services by attorneys and, thus, “may not be subjected to blanket suppression”
• noting that the legal sophistication of the audience is a key consideration in determining whether legal advertising is misleading
• recognizing that state courts may exercise legislative powers
• recognizing that state courts may exercise legislative powers
• \[A]dvertising claims as to the quality of legal services . . . may be so likely to be misleading as to warrant restriction\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).