Skip to main content
· 6/30/1945

Protest 99833-K of Ross Bros.

Citations

  • 15 Cust. Ct. 227

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that felon in possession (FIP)-firearm, as charged in that case, did not require defendant to use the firearm “against another person,” an element in UUW- firearm because a defendant could discharge the firearm without another person present
  • explaining that felon in possession (FIP)-firearm, as charged in that case, did not require defendant to use the firearm “against another person,” an element in UUW- firearm because a defendant could discharge the firearm without another person present
  • discussing the “element-by-element comparison contemplated by ORS 161.067”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ekwall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.