Protest 99574-K of P. Silverman & Son

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding an error was harmless where the trial court made an explicit statement that each probation violation was an independently sufficient ground for revocation
• concluding an error was harmless where the trial court made an explicit statement that each probation violation was an independently sufficient ground for revocation
• affirming where trial court “found that any one of the bases would have been sufficient to support the revocation” of the defendant’s probation
• affirming where trial court “found that any one of the bases would have been sufficient to support the revocation” of the defendant’s probation
• affirming where trial court “found that any one of the bases would have been sufficient to support the revocation” of the defendant’s probation
• affirming revocation where a single probation violation was well founded, when the trial court stated that it would have revoked probation based on any one of multiple violations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).