Protest 969874-G of W. X. Huber Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding employer intended to be 5 bound to agreement to arbitrate it despite not signing it in part because it was printed on 6 company letterhead and was provided as part of a “New Hire packet”
• severing provision of an arbitration agreement that provided injunctive relief but preserving 23 the remainder of the agreement and compelling arbitration
• finding the single substantively unconscionable provision barring injunctive relief severable because the provision is “collateral to the main purpose of the contract” and not even implicated by the plaintiffs case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).