Protest 958366-G of Bullocks, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• plaintiff’s claim that “defendants represented that underwriting standards would generally be followed and that exceptions would be made when compensating factors were present, but that this was untrue,” was sufficient to survive motion to dismiss
• reaching same conclusion regarding a suit filed in November 2007
• rejecting this same argument for an “inquiry notice” standard

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).