Protest 952589-G of S. S. Kresge Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a judge may not substitute their opinion on a finding of fact when there is substantial evidence in the record to support that finding, “even though there also might be substantial evi- dence to support a contrary finding”
• “When in a review role, a court does not review for the better evidence.”
• “When in a review role, a court does not review for the better evidence.”
• “A substantial evidence review does not entail or permit the reviewing tribunal to reweigh or to assess the credibility of the evidence that was presented to the fact-finding body.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.)
• “A substantial evidence review does not entail or permit the reviewing tribunal to reweigh or to assess the credibility of the evidence that was presented to the factfinding body.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.)
• “A substantial evidence review does not entail or permit the reviewing tribunal to reweigh or to assess the credibility of the evidence that was presented to the factfinding body.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).