Protest 933506-G of Nippon Import & Trading Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• describing the relevant inquiry as whether “an objectively reasonable member of the public would have believed that he or she could enter the private *** property without permission”
• “The state, as the proponent of the evidence that resulted from the deputy’s warrantless entry onto private property, bore the burden of proving that defendant lacked a protected privacy interest in the property.”
• Under Article I, section 9, “a person has a protected privacy interest in property outside the curtilage of a residence if the person manifests an intention to exclude the public from the property!,]” by fencing it, posting it, or otherwise closing it off.
• declining to address undeveloped Fourth Amendment claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).