Protest 894287-G of Sun Wing Wo Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the holding in State v. Brody, 69 Or App 469, 473, 686 P2d 451 (1984), did not “surviv[e] the Supreme Court’s decision” in State v. Owens, 302 Or 196, 729 P2d 524 (1986)
• explaining the scope and intensity of a search incident to arrest
• “[O]fficers may open a closed con- tainer in conducting a search incident to arrest if evidence of the crime of arrest reasonably could be concealed in that container.”
• “Article I, section 9, authorizes a search incident to arrest for three purposes: (1) to protect the officer’s safety; (2) to prevent the destruction of evidence; and (3) to discover evidence of the crime of arrest.”
• “A search is rea- sonable in scope and intensity if it is sufficiently close in space to the arrest; that is, if it is confined to the area that was in the immediate control of the suspect at the time of the arrest[.]” (Internal quotation marks omitted.)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).