Protest 86107-K of Gellman Bros.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that, in light of Section 1914, ICWA arguments are “reviewable despite not being preserved”
• concluding that the establishment of an ORS 419B.366 temporary guardianship is a foster care placement under ICWA
• rejecting argument that a durable guardianship under ORS 419B.366 is not a “foster care placement” under the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA
• “[T]he guardianship in this case[, which was established under ORS 419B.366,] was a ‘foster care placement’ under ICWA.”
• “[T]he guardianship in this case[, which was established under ORS 419B.366,] was a ‘foster care placement’ under ICWA.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).