Protest 810124-G of Kolmar, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a court should only overturn prec- edent that is “plainly wrong”—“a rigorous standard, sat- isfied only in exceptional circumstances”
• stating that we will only overturn prior precedent where it is “‘plainly wrong,’ a rigorous standard grounded in presumptive fidelity to stare decisis”
• explaining that we will overrule our own prior construction of a statute only when it is “plainly wrong”
• explaining that we do not “lightly overrule our precedents, including those con- struing statutes” and adhere to the “plainly wrong” require- ment to do so
• explaining that the plainly wrong standard is “a rigorous standard grounded in presumptive fidelity to stare decisis”
• explaining that a party seeking to have one of our prior decisions overruled must demonstrate that the prior decision was “plainly wrong”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).