Protest 787858-G of F. W. Woolworth Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the FCA 17 does not preempt New Jersey’s Conscientious Employee Protection Act
• declining to consider the defendants’ argument that the allegedly defamatory statements were true and considering only the plaintiff’s allegation that the statements were false because “this is a motion to dismiss, and not a summary judgment motion”
• “[CEPA] creates individual liability for agents of the employer, including supervisory employees[.]”
• “[T]here are no special requirements for defamation actions under the federal rules. All that is required is a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief.” (internal quotation marks omitted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).