Protest 7334-K of Golding Bros. Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that Linkedln did not commit, a “highly offensive” invasion of users’ privacy by disclosing users’ browsing histories to third parties
• holding that under California law, user identification numbers and user resource locators of users’ profile pages on a social media website were not capable of exclusive control so the consumer had no property interest in the information to support a conversion claim
• recognizing a “high bar” for pleading 16 invasion of privacy claims
• dismissing on reliance grounds where complaint described the privacy policy at issue, but failed to allege that plaintiffs “saw or read it.”
• finding such allegations “too abstract and speculative to support Article III standing”
• the Court should not grant leave to amend “where doing so would be an exercise in 1 futility.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).