Protest 48273-K of Edward E. Ziskand Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a general motion for judgment of acquittal without spec- ifying any theory is insufficient to preserve defendant’s argu- ments
• holding that a general motion for judgment of acquittal without spec- ifying any theory is insufficient to preserve defendant’s argu- ments
• declining to correct error in failing to acquit the defendant of charges because, if the defendant “had adequately raised his objection in the trial court, the court could have remedied the error by allowing the state to reopen its case to produce additional evidence”
• “One of the policies underlying the preservation require- ment is that of allowing the opposing party the opportunity to respond to the asserted error.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).