Skip to main content
· 7/1/1946

Protest 25325-K of Tuck High & Co.

Citations

  • 16 Cust. Ct. 230

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • identifying and paraphrasing the form of the offense charged
  • for merger purposes, “when a statute provides, as ORS 163.425(1
  • for merger purposes, “when a statute provides, as ORS 163.425(1) does, for alter- native means of committing a crime, we look to the indict- ment to see what form of the crime is alleged” (emphasis 2 See State v. Raygosa, 320 Or App 77, 81, 512 P3d 824, rev den, 370 Or 455 (2022

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mollison

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.