Protest 116240-K of French Line, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting the expert testimony on grooming concerning how offenders often choose vulnerable child was relevant to understand the defendant’s plan and preparation
• upholding admission of testimony “objectively describing characteristics typical of grooming in family sex abuse cases,” and then applying that knowledge to the behaviors described by the victim
• testimony that defendant groomed the victim, by increasing touching over time in order to sexually abuse the victim, was admissible
• testimony about concept of grooming could assist the jury to understand specific behav- ior by the defendant
• testimony that defendant groomed the victim, by increasing touching over time in order to sexually abuse the victim, was admissible

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).