Protest 110877-K of Danzig

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that erroneously admitted hearsay evidence was not harmless because \there was no overwhelming evidence of guilt for defendant's convictions\
• concluding that erroneously admitted hearsay evidence was not harmless because “there was no overwhelming evidence of guilt for defendant’s convictions”
• concluding that erroneously admitted hearsay evidence was not harmless because “there was no overwhelming evidence of guilt for defendant’s convictions”
• noting state’s concession that, “given when the victim’s alleged motive to fabricate arose, her statements were not admissible under OEC 801(4)(a)(B)”
• error in admitting hearsay statements that the state offered to rehabilitate the complainant’s testimony under OEC 801(4)(a)(B) was not harmless where “the state’s case largely depended on the [complainant’s] credibility”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).