Protection One Alarm Monitoring, Inc. v. Executive Protection One Security Service, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reducing requested hourly rates “because counsel has failed to provide information regarding the experience levels of the- attorneys who worked on the case”
• reducing requested hourly rates “because counsel has failed to provide information regarding the experience levels of the attorneys who worked on the case”
• declining to award costs in part because “the burden is on the moving party to explain and justify the costs”
• reducing hourly rates from $375 to $300 and $275 to $200 because “counsel has failed to provide information regarding the experience level of the attorneys”
• “Courts generally award costs to prevailing parties in cases involving violations of the Lanham Act.”
• “Courts generally award costs to prevailing parties in cases involving violations of the Lanham Act.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).