Protection Mutual Insurance v. Mitsubishi Silicon America Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding insured unentitled to business interruption coverage, where threat of imminent flooding at local water treatment facility, and not physical loss or damage to covered property, caused the insured’s water service to be temporarily suspended
• “A court can consider such extrinsic evidence in interpreting an insurance contract only if it first finds the policy to be ambiguous.”
• “A court can consider such extrinsic evidence in interpreting an insurance contract only if it first finds the policy to be ambiguous.”’
• court may consider extrinsic evidence in interpreting an insurance contract only if it first finds the policy to be ambiguous
• court may consider extrinsic evidence in interpreting an insurance contract only if it first finds the policy to be ambiguous

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).