Prosser v. Hardesty

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiff in RSA 354-A retaliation case established prima facie case by producing evidence that she filed a sexual harassment complaint and was terminated eight days later
• noting that New Hampshire courts rely on Title VII cases to analyze claims brought under the NH LAD
• explaining that close temporal proximity may permit a factfinder to infer causation
• interpreting section 354-A:7 of the New Hampshire Revised Statutes in accordance with relevant Title VII employer liability standards for coworker sexual harassment
• interpreting section 354-A:19 of the New Hampshire Revised Statutes in accordance with Title VII employer liability standards for retaliation
• analyzing federal employment discrimination law and holding that an eight-day period between protected activity and adverse employment action is sufficient to support an inference of causation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).