Prosper Diagnostic Centers, Inc. v. Allstate Insurance Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting Ex Post Facto challenge to 1994, 1995, and 1997 versions of Connecticut registration law
• disagreeing with claim that exclusion of defendant’s statement to father raises constitutional question, and concluding, instead, that claim was evi- dentiary in nature, subject to review under abuse of discretion standard
• disagreeing with claim that exclusion of defendant’s statement to father raises constitutional question, and concluding, instead, that claim was evi- dentiary in nature, subject to review under abuse of discretion standard
• overlapping constancy testimony still was not necessarily unfairly duplicative following Troupe
• no violation of constitutional right to present defense where subject matter of precluded testimony was presented through other witnesses
• no violation of constitutional right to present defense where subject matter of precluded testimony was presented through other witnesses

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).