Prosonic Corp. v. Stafford

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that employer’s claim that a former employee solicited other employees was “mere speculation” because employer failed to produce evidence that former employee personally induced employees to leave the company
• holding that employer’s claim that a former employee solicited other employees was “mere speculation” because employer failed to produce evidence that former employee personally induced employees to leave the company
• finding a threat of irreparable harm where a former employee, in possession of confidential trade secrets commenced working for the plaintiff’s competitor in a substantially similar capacity to the position he held while employed by the plaintiff

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).