Skip to main content
· 3/6/1924

Prose v. Beardsley

Citations

  • 18 Ohio App. 211
  • 1924 Ohio App. LEXIS 116

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that while the federal and Ohio double-dismissal rules “are not identical” they do “share many common features” and are “similar enough that cases interpreting the federal two-dismissal rule are fully relevant” to interpreting Ohio’s double-dismissal rule
  • recognizing that while the federal and Ohio double-dismissal rules “are not identical” they do “share many common features” and are “similar enough that cases interpreting the federal two-dismissal rule are fully relevant” to interpreting Ohio’s double-dismissal rule

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mauck, Middleton, Sayre

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.