Propst v. Morgan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, in those rare cases in which an appeal is dismissed under OCGA § 5-6-48 (c
• holding that, in those rare cases in which an appeal is dismissed under OCGA § 5-6-48 (c
• explaining that if a motion to recuse is improperly denied, \all proceedings after the filing of the motion\ are invalid (emphasis added)
• explaining that if a motion to recuse is improperly denied, “all proceedings after the filing of the motion” are invalid (emphasis supplied)
• noting that a trial court’s ruling on whether a delay in filing transcript is inexcusable and caused by the appellant will be reviewed on appeal only for abuse of discretion
• addressing the merits of a party's recusal motion against the trial judge is an exception to the general rule that an appellate court decides whether the trial court properly dismissed an appeal before it addresses the merits of the appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).