Pronin v. Raffi Custom Photo Lab., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting age-based hostile work environment claim where comments at issue did not reference age and plaintiff offered no evidence, other than his own speculation, that the comments were motivated by his age
• no age discrimination where “the hiring and firing decisions were made within two years of each other”
• “While ‘facially neutral incidents may be included,’ ... plaintiff nevertheless must offer some evidence from which a reasonable jury could infer that the facially-neutral incidents were in fact discriminatory.”
• “[M]erely working in the same area as [the individual who was harassed] and witnessing” a harassing incident does not, without more, affect “the terms and conditions of [a plaintiff’s] employment.”
• “[I]n determining whether a comment is a probative statement that evidences an intent to discriminate or whether it is a non-probative ‘stray remark,’ a court should consider the following factors: (1

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).