Skip to main content
· 6/27/2003

Pronesti v. State

Citations

  • 847 So. 2d 1165
  • 2003 WL 21471637

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that statements by defendant's employee to undercover police officer regarding sex for money were admissible as nonhearsay verbal acts

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thompson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.