ProMed Healthcare v. City of Kalamazoo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating, “the preponderance of the evidence standard applies to a petitioner’s attempts to establish membership in an already exempt class”
• affirming the MTT’s denial of a “public health” and “charitable institution” exemptions in part because the petitioner “failed to present evidence that its provision of charitable medical care constituted anything more than an incidental part of its operations”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).