Prokop v. Ragen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the issue of bad faith is a matter for the jury
• \[T]he insurer was amply protected by the instructions that bad faith 'carries with it a suggestion of dishonesty' and is 'a species of fraud.'\
• “one may recover those damages in a fraud action which are the natural and proximate result of the fraud”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).