Progressive Exp. v. McGRATH CHIROPRACTIC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that party’s standing is determined at time suit is filed and cannot be acquired after the fact
• stating that the relation back of amendments “does not permit a party to establish the right to maintain an action retroactively by acquiring standing to file a lawsuit after the fact.”
• stating that the relation back of amendments “does not permit a party to establish the right to maintain an action retroactively by acquiring standing to file a lawsuit after the fact”
• following Voges v. Ward, 98 Fla. 304, 123 So. 785 (1929), and Marianna & B.R. Co. v. Maund, 62 Fla. 538, 56 So. 670 (1911)
• stating that the “relation back” rule found in Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.190(c) “does not permit a party to establish the right to maintain an action retroactively by acquiring standing to file a lawsuit after the fact”
• finding a miscarriage where \the circuit court's decision had the potential to be applied in future . . . proceedings\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).