Skip to main content
· 12/28/2007

PROGRESSIVE EXP. INS. CO. v. Reed

Citations

  • 971 So. 2d 176
  • 2007 WL 4547493

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that abatement or stay of declaratory judgment action on insurance coverage issues while underlying tort action was pending was a departure from the essential requirements of law
  • holding that the claims were mutually exclusive because “[i]f [the insurance company] were to succeed in its declaratory judgment action, it would be relieved of the obligation to defend the tort action”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Monaco

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.