Skip to main content
· 4/11/2006

Progressive Classic Insurance v. Blaud

Citations

  • 132 P.3d 298
  • 212 Ariz. 359
  • 475 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 17
  • 2006 Ariz. App. LEXIS 51

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that compliance with the UMA corroboration requirement did not 4 entitle claimant to summary judgment on issue of coverage
  • “successful party” in insurance coverage dispute entitled to attorney’s fees pursuant to state’s general fees statute, Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-341.01 [2003]

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Snow, Hall, Norris

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.