Progressive Casualty Insurance v. Marca

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• phrase “arising in the course of employment” in liability policy exclusion for bodily injury to employee of an insured arising in the course of employment has the same meaning as in statute defining “compensable injury” for workers’ compensation purposes. ORS 656.005(7)(a)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Ottumwa Housing Authority v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1993-02-17· cited 36×
• McLeod v. Tecorp International, Ltd.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1992-12-30· cited 8×
• Garrett v. New Hampshire Insurance
  D. Oregon· 2012-03-20· cited 1×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Rogers v. State Accident Insurance Fund
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1980-09-10· cited 75×
• I-L Logging Co. v. Manufacturers & Wholesalers Indemnity Exchange
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1954-07-13· cited 63×
• Anfilofieff v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1981-05-11· cited 17×
• Bos v. State Industrial Accident Commission
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1957-09-06· cited 8×
• Preston v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1987-11-18· cited 6×
• Gordon v. Farrell
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1987-06-03· cited 3×
• Progressive Casualty Insurance v. Marca
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1989-11-29· cited 3×

Other cases named Progressive Casualty Insurance v. Marca

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Progressive Casualty Insurance v. Marca
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1989-11-29· cited 3×