Proffitt v. UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COM'N

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that because the term conviction is ambiguous to lawyers, judges and laymen, the claimant did not commit misconduct when she wrote she had not been convicted of felony where adjudication had been withheld
• “In order to constitute misconduct under this section, the claimant’s action must be more than an error in judgment or discretion, and the employer must prove that the employee’s action was willful, wanton, or deliberate.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).