Professionals and Patients for Customized Care v. Shalala

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that an FDA policy delineating nine factors the agency should consider in determining whether to bring an enforcement action did not constitute a substantive rule
• concluding that an FDA policy delineating nine factors the agency should consider in determining whether to bring an enforcement action did not constitute a substantive rule
• concluding that an FDA policy delineating nine factors the agency should consider in determining whether to bring an enforcement action did not constitute a substantive rule
• reasoning that “informal communications often exhibit a lack of ‘precision of draftsmanship’ and . . . internal inconsistencies” and thus are “entitled to limited weight”
• reasoning that “informal communications often exhibit a lack of ‘precision of draftsmanship’ and ... internal inconsistencies” and thus are “entitled to limited weight”
• reasoning that “informal communications often exhibit a lack of ‘precision of draftsmanship’ and . . . internal inconsistencies” and thus are “entitled to limited weight”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).